Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rugg v. Tafoya et al
as 2:2020cv00353
Defendant:
L Rivas, Alisha Lucero Tafoya and German Franco
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Rugg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siracusa v. State of Colorado, et al
as 1:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Siracusa
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Fremont County Sheriff, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siracusa v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2015cv02393
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Siracusa
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2012cv03147
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Nola Fulsom, FNU LNU (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Fulsom, et al
as 12-3086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
NOLA FULSOM, Sedgwich County District Attorney, (FNU) GOESMAN, Honorable Judge, Sedgwick County Judicial Branch, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Jenkins v. State of Kansas, et al
as 12-3088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, SEDGWICK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, NOLA FULSOM, Segwick County Attorney and others
Jenkins v. State of Kansas, et al
as 12-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, DON L. SCOTT, Seward County Attorney, TOM SMITH, Seward County District Court Judge and others
Jenkins v. Fulsom et al
as 5:2012cv03035
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Nola Fulsom, (fnu) Goesman, Kansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2012cv03029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Sedgwick County Detention Center, Nola Fulsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2011cv03231
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Don L. Scott, Tom Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
