Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Cahill et al
as 5:2022cv03305
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Cahill, Tonda Hill, Candice Alcaraz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Defendant:
Steven Bourne, Emily Porterfield, Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2020cv03263
Petitioner:
Cox
Respondent:
Ed Caley
Defendant:
Larry (I) Winegardner, Owens, James (I) Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Emily Porter Field, Steven Bourne, Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Winegardner et al
as 1:2019cv02971
Defendant:
Fagerstedt, Holland, Caley and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bourne et al
as 1:2019cv01654
Defendant:
Madigan Fagerstedt, Caley, Lincoln and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Boone County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2018cv03105
Plaintiff:
Jay Wayne Dixon
Defendant:
Boone County Sheriff's Department and Boone County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jolley v. Boone County Jail et al
as 5:2017cv03219
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Jolley
Defendant:
Boone County Jail and Advanced Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enloe v. Boone County Jail et al
as 5:2017cv03200
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Enloe
Defendant:
Boone County Jail, Missouri, State of, Columbia, Missouri, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
