Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gosberry, Miguel E. Tapia, Andrew McKinney and others
Defendant:
FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher, Summit Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv03021
Plaintiff:
Terence L. Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Gwynne E. Birzer, Eric F. Melgren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03225
Defendant:
Kathy S. Hill, Sarah Canty, Kathryn H. Vratil and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burgess v. Utah State Prison
as 2:2017cv01253
Petitioner:
William Richard Burgess
Respondent:
Utah State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burgess v. Utah State Prison et al
as 2:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
William Richard Burgess
Defendant:
Utah State Prison, Bureau of Prisons, Billie Casper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Garvin et al
as 6:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mel Bennett
Defendant:
Jeremy Garvin, Tim Burgess and Christian Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walling (ID 41769) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2017cv03086
Petitioner:
Terry F. Walling
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood, Doug Burgess, Andrea Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burgess v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00104
Petitioner:
Stephen Duane Burgess
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
