Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Barclay v. Choate
as 23-1204
Petitioner: MAURICE LAMAR BARCLAY
Respondent: J. CHOATE
Partee v. White
as 1:2023cv00164
Petitioner: Kelly Partee
Respondent: Eric Barclay White, Michelle Amico and Eric White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barclay v. Choate
as 1:2022cv03323
Petitioner: Maurice Lamar Barclay
Respondent: J. Choate and Choate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barclay v. Choate et al
as 1:2022cv01472
Petitioner: Maurice Barclay
Respondent: J. Choate, John Fabbricator, Mathew T. Albene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Partee v. White
as 1:2021cv02802
Plaintiff: Kelly Pardee and Kelly Partee
Defendant: Eric Barclay White and Arapahoe County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Walton
as 4:2021cv00177
Petitioner: Barclay Pratt
Respondent: Scott Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Irvin v. Janski et al
as 1:2020cv02890
Defendant: Kathleen Marie Janski, Blasewitz, Anne Marie Ollada and others
Plaintiff: Marquise Antonio Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barclay v. Bryant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv01369
Petitioner: Wayne Handley Barclay
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks et al v. Nett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00983
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks, Spence Taylor and John Michael
Defendant: Elizabeth Nett, Ralph Shrader, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taber v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01113
Plaintiff: Barclay Taber
Defendant: Justin Jones, Claude Chester and Teresa Holsten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?