Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bingham v. Taylor
as 2:2021cv00392
Respondent:
Richard Taylor
Petitioner:
Edward Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wallace v. Thompson et al
as 2:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
James Lee Wallace
Defendant:
Terry Thompson, FNU Odekirk, R. Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Trani, et al
as 16-1154
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE BINGHAM, Native American "Chocta" National - "Texan" Stateless - Nonresident Non-Taxpayer Transient Choctaw
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI, Warden, CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Bingham v. Trani et al
as 1:2015cv01229
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Bingham
Respondent:
Travis Trani and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bingham v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2014cv00316
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Bingham
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bingham v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE BINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
ARSTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director, CDOC, TIMME, FCF, KOCHEVER and others
Bingham v. Zavaras, et al
as 10-1293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE BINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMME, FCF, TAPPI, KOCHEVER and others
Bingham v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Bingham
Defendant:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Timme, Kochever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03144
Petitioner:
Michael W Bingham
Respondent:
Kansas Department of Corrections and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bingham v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03112
Petitioner:
Michael W Bingham
Respondent:
Kansas Department of Corrections and Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
