Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Miller (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01652
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Petitioner:
Earl D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunnicutt v. Peters, et al
as 22-2053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARNELL HUNNICUTT, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL PETERS, Warden, WILLIAM EDGMAN, Deputy Warden, ESTEVAN FLORES and others
Miller v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2020cv00269
Petitioner:
Demetrius D Miller, Jr
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stine v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-1319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID ALLRED, CHRISTOPHER WILSON and others
Stine v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv01504
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Allred, Christopher Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-1236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHRISTOPHER WILSON, ADX, DAVID ALLRED, Clinical Director, ADX and others
Stine v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Allred, Christopher Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00902
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Allred, Christopher Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatten v. Barker, et al
as 11-1164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
A. BARKER, R. ANDERT, J. C. HOLLAND and others
Hatten v. Barker et al
as 1:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
A. Barker, R. Andert, J. C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
