Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Daniels (PS) et al v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Danny Dermill Daniels, Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, James Jamual Famin and others
Defendant:
USA, City of Denver, The and City of Aurora, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chestine (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Chestine, Jr.
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eaves (PS) v. Kory et al
as 1:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eaves and Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Kory, Jerry Roark, Danny Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaves v. Skramsted et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Skramsted, Vanessa Carson, Kory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbott v. Trujillo et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Patrick Abbott
Defendant:
Monique Trujillo, Cruz Soto and Danny Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. MCCollum et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stephens
Defendant:
John Musso, Graham Hoffman, Michael McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Recio v. Dice et al
as 1:2021cv02041
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Recio
Defendant:
Dice, Lemons and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson v. Costilla County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2021cv01942
Plaintiff:
Jessie Carson
Defendant:
Costilla County Board of Commissioners, Danny Sanchez, Alicia Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. A.W.
as 1:2021cv00802
Defendant:
A.W.
Plaintiff:
Danny Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. Shaetzle et al
as 1:2019cv03223
Plaintiff:
Darren Hoffman
Defendant:
Abraham Balderrama, Mickey Shaetzle, Robin Danni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
