Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 439
Peeples v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00294
Petitioner: Howard Eugene Peeples, Jr
Respondent: Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez (PS) v. Parks et al
as 1:2024cv01513
Plaintiff: Eugene Martinez
Defendant: Parks, Fernandez, James Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Banks
as 24-6073
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL EUGENE BANKS, AKA Bird, AKA Birdie, AKA Tiny Bird
Keller v. USA
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner: Anthony Eugene Keller
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Travis v. Seminole Nation Tribal Court
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner: Ralph Eugene Travis
Respondent: Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Callaway (PS) v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: Kenneth Jessie Callaway
Defendant: Gary Eugene Miller, Raymond Lee Johnson, Christopher M Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cramer v. Bridges We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner: Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. USA
as 6:2024cv00012
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Brown
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Antoine (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Maurice Eugene Antoine
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?