Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hull (ID 126191) v. Dedeke et al
as 5:2021cv03262
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ricky Hull
Defendant:
Andrew Dedeke and Eric Thorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wind v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Kate Knowles, Matthew Newcomer, James McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ansley v. Hull et al
as 1:2018cv00551
Plaintiff:
Kaheem Ricky Ansley
Defendant:
William J. Hull, William G.W. Shoobridge, Erik Scramlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickson v. Hull et al
as 1:2017cv01081
Plaintiff:
Steven Donell Nickson
Defendant:
William J. Hull, William G.W. Shoebridge, Fifth Judicial District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Reynolds, et al
as 15-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN REYNOLDS, ROBERT PATTON, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Green v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rickke L Green
Defendant:
Dan Reynolds, Robert Patton, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Hull
as 5:2014cv03057
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Beth Hull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center, Pam Butler, Drew Scarsborough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hodge (ID 6008057) v. Topeka Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2012cv03228
Plaintiff:
Natasha Genene Hodge
Defendant:
Topeka Correctional Facility, Kansas Department of Corrections, Deb Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims-Dupont v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2007cv02193
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Sims-Dupont
Defendant:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Steven Hartley, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
