Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez v. Biden, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO P. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, et al., MAYORKAS, et al., DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS, GOVERNOR J. POLIS, et al. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00464
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Malachowski v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Marcel Malachowski
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, R Calloway, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kanev v. United States, et al
as 22-1166
Petitioner / Appellant:
TSVETAN KANEV and TSVETAN KANEV KANEV
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICER OLEJNIZACK, Officer in charge, Aurora Processing Center, OFFICER SMITH, ICE Denver Field Office, Centennial and others
Wright v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2021cv03506
Plaintiff:
Charles Antonio Devon Wright
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2021cv03477
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Wright
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
