Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Camacho v. CNMI Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections, LT. Benjamin Lizama and COIII Lianna Quitugua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Kearns Unified Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Stewart
Defendant:
Kearns Unified Police Department and FNU Shaw
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. Yaroitemal et al
as 1:2018cv00021
Defendant:
Captain Pius Yaroitemal, Manuela Deleon Guerrero, Jose K. Pangelinan and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho et al
as 1:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho, Jose Santos and Xu Guang Li
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Vincent S. Attao, Georgia M. Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. CNMI Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. James
as 6:2014cv00268
Petitioner:
Frank Dillard, Jr.
Respondent:
Jesse James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States v. Ramsey
as 14-6067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESSE JAMES RAMSEY, III
Ramsey v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv01336
Petitioner:
Jesse James Ramsey, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anderson v. Jones, et al
as 6:2013cv00157
Petitioner:
Jesse James Anderson
Respondent:
William Monday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Jones
as 5:2013cv00220
Petitioner:
Jesse James Anderson
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
