Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Garcia v. Reigenborn et al
as 1:2022cv02896
Plaintiff:
Alexander Noel Garcia
Defendant:
Richard A. Reigenborn, Kenny Sherman, Wilfred Europe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heurung v. Krause et al
as 1:2017cv02914
Plaintiff:
Johnny Heurung
Defendant:
Krause, Malatinsky, Watcha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Krause v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00205
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerome Walter Krause
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Miller v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv01190
Plaintiff:
Nick Miller
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Radick v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RADICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, F.B.O.P., MIKE NALLEY, Regional Director, F.B.O.P., N. FIELDS, Administrative Remedy Coordinator North Central Regional Office and others
Radick v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv02504
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radick
Defendant:
USA, Harley Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaramillo v. Krause, et al
as 09-1224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PORCAYO JARAMILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
G. THOMAS KRAUSE, MD - Clinical Director, PERCIVAL URBANO, FMG-MLP, T. TSUDA and others
Jaramillo v. Krause et al
as 1:2008cv01918
Plaintiff:
Porcayo Jaramillo
Defendant:
G. Thomas Krause, Percival Urbano, T. Tsuda and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sutton v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 08-1279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH M. SUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN KRAUSE and others
Lyons v. Holt, et al
as 1:2001cv02170
Plaintiff:
Deon Lorenzo Lyons
Defendant:
Robert E. Williams , Jere G. Sutton , Virgil Camagay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
