Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Thomas v. Boncher
as 5:2022cv03048
Petitioner:
Terence L. Thomas
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv03021
Plaintiff:
Terence L. Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Gwynne E. Birzer, Eric F. Melgren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv03059
Plaintiff:
Terence L. Thomas
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), United States of America, A. Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All Filings to be Made in Case 16-CR-10034-EFM Only***
as 6:2019cv01211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terence L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Abdulhaseeb v. Allbaugh
as 16-6053
Petitioner - Appellant:
MADYUN ABDULHASEEB, AKA Jerry L. Thomas
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE M. ALLBAUGH, Interim Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Thomas v. Rio
as 13-6191
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
H. A. RIOS, JR., Warden
Thomas v. Chester, et al
as 13-6132
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
C. CHESTER, Warden
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Abdulhaseeb v. Jone
as 13-6103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MADYUN ABDULHASEEB, AKA Jerry L. Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Thomas v. Rios et al
as 5:2013cv00350
Petitioner:
Jerry L Thomas
Respondent:
H A Rios, Jr and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stine v. Berkebile, et al
as 13-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. BERKEBILE, Warden, ADX, C. WILSON, ADX, JON MATTHES, DDS (EX-ADX Dentist) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
