Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ryan v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00956
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, David (I) Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnee Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03095
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark S. Inch, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03094
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark S. Inch, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins v. Santini et al
as 1:2018cv00297
Plaintiff:
Willie Eugene Collins
Defendant:
Santini, Conroy, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Inch
as 09-3083
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ISAIAH TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK S INCH, Commandant, USDB-Ft. Leavenworth
Daniels v. Inch
as 5:2008cv03041
Petitioner:
Lloyd Daniels
Respondent:
Mark S Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Inch, et al
as 07-3339
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK S INCH, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas and JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
Bridges v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv03284
Petitioner:
Heinz Douglass Bridges
Respondent:
United States of America and Mark S Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Inch
as 5:2007cv03034
Petitioner:
Marcus L Williams
Respondent:
Mark S Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Inch et al
as 5:2007cv03018
Petitioner:
Marcus L Williams
Respondent:
Mark S Inch and Judge Advocate General of the United States Air Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
