Cases 1 - 10 of 774
Begay v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00619
Petitioner:
Marty Robert Begay
Respondent:
Ronald Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Lucero et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lucero, Antonio Martinez, Antonio E. Cavasos and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbarker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 24-8040
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SETH NORRIS, individually and as warden of Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and others
Porter v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Billy Porter
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility, Ronald Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martinez (PS) v. Parks et al
as 1:2024cv01513
Plaintiff:
Eugene Martinez
Defendant:
Parks, Fernandez, James Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Himelstieb v. Brandenburg, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
TYLER HIMELSTIEB
Defendant:
BRANDENBURG, Mental Health Clinician and TERRY MARTINEZ, Prison Nurse
Hoffman et al v. State of New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Zachary Hoffman, David T. Hernandez, Randy Lopez and others
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Shawnessy Martinez
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
