Cases 1 - 10 of 88
McDonald v. Lilly et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Alexis McDonald, Jr
Defendant:
Amanda Lilly, Garfield County Detention Center and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alter (PS) v. Gates et al
as 1:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
William Neil Alter
Defendant:
John Gates, Raymond Lee, III, Tommy Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McDonald
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and FNU Wilkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald (PS) v. Lakewood Police Dept
as 1:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Nicholas McDonald
Defendant:
Lakewood Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. Zmuda, et al
as 24-3022
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM ERWIN
Defendant:
JEFF ZMUDA, LIBBY KEOGH, DARCIE HOLTHOUS and others
McDonald (D 113183) v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Tommy Williams and Gregory Dimarzo
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv03297
Plaintiff:
Nicholas McDonald
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv03211
Petitioner:
Collin J. McDonald
Respondent:
Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
