Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Davis v. United States, et al
as 24-3045
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, City of Washington, District of Columbia, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. and others
Davis v. United States, et al
as 24-3027
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, City of Washington, District of Columbia, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. and others
Davis (ID 6598) v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Twitty v. United States, et al
as 22-1127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE J. TWITTY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAY CRIPPS, CELESTE B. RANGEL and others
Twitty v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv03411
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
USA, Jay Cripps, Celeste Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Center for Disease Control et al
as 1:2021cv00828
Plaintiff:
Donald Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
Center for Disease Control, Bill Gates and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glivar v. Victory Outreach et al
as 1:2019cv00836
Defendant:
Victory Outreach, Google, Marisol Larez and others
Plaintiff:
Meigra Marie Glivar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez, et al v. Six unknown agents, et al
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Rodriguez and Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six unkwon names agents and Obama Barack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Obama
as 17-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGIL F. RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
