Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Gravlee v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee
Defendant:
FNU Tibbs, FNU Prince, FNU Kala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avila (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Robert Avila
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Jenni Prince and Edward Popovich, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Lawson et al
as 5:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Bernard Crawford
Defendant:
Regina Lawson, Steven Bickley, T Hastings Siegfried and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Prince
as 23-1225
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH PRINCE
Jones (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01825
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv03262
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prince v. USA
as 1:2022cv03152
Petitioner:
Joseph Prince
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv02854
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Jones
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Jennifer Seroski, B. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv02855
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Jones
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jennifer Seroski and B. Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Goldey et al
as 5:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Goldey, Associate Warden Michelli, Captain Bouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
