Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Rivers (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Jerome N. Rivers
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Youth and Family Services of Enid et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Black
Defendant:
Youth and Family Services of Enid, Melissa L Blanton, Garfield County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kliewer v. Garfield County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kliewer
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Center, Corey Rink and Daylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Garfield County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Wright
Defendant:
Garfield County Jail, Corey Rink and Daylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Rinks et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Andrew Byrd
Defendant:
Corey Rinks and Dylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Ouachita River Correctional Unit
as 5:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
Ouachita River Correctional Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Manning v. LNU et al
as 5:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Garland M Manning
Defendant:
Dean LNU, Daylon Rivers and Garfield County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
