Cases 1 - 10 of 462
Stephens v. New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Celso Kevin Stephens
Defendant:
New Mexico, Google, TicTok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Jones
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
John Miguel Swan
Respondent:
Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant:
Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. State of Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Ernest Cunningham
Defendant:
State of Colorado Department of Corrections, Stephen (I) Montoya, Stephen Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague (PS) v. Kurtenbach et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
David Adam Teague
Defendant:
Angela Kurtenbach, Stephen Giles and Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Charles R Bowlds
Defendant:
Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Tim Laughlin, Cindy Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf (PS) v. Sinnott
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Wolf
Defendant:
Kathy Sinnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
