Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Crothers v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 1:2022cv00268
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General, Teton County Sheriff, Bridget Hill and others
Petitioner:
William Michael Crothers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daskalakis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 5:2013cv03083
Plaintiff:
Basile Daskalakis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kansas, State of, Sedgwick County Commissioners, Board of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daskalakis v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Basile Daskalakis
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Garfield County of, Mary Fallin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daskalakis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 5:2012cv03186
Plaintiff:
Basile Daskalakis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kansas, State of, Sedgwick County Commissioners, Board of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 11-8041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, TETON COUNTY, HANK PHIBBS and others
Williams v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Teton County, Hank Phibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v Teton County Detention Center et al
as 2:2009cv00255
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Teton County Detention Center, Ninth Judicial District Circuit Court, Teton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2009cv00242
Petitioner:
Derrick L Williams
Respondent:
State of Wyoming, Teton County Deputy Prosecutor, Jefferson County Court of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
