Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Livingston v. Weigant et al
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston also known as Aaron J Livingston Clarke also known as GTWO doing business as God Touches World Order, Aaron J Livingston Clarke and GTWO
Defendant:
Patrick Weigant, Public Defenders Office and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Talin Market World Food Fare
as 2:2021cv01012
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Talin Market World Food Fare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv01532
Petitioner:
Jose Garcia
Respondent:
Jacqueline Smith, Van Kemp, Van Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rucker v. Vatican Bank, et al
as 15-3171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW RUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
VATICAN BANK, THE WORLD BANK, THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND and others
Todd v. USA, et al
as 15-1249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON TYROME TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
USA, in corporate capacity, U.S. PERSON(S), named herein as John Does in corporate capacity and THE WORLD BANK, capacity as USA Alter Ego
Rucker (ID 82532) v. Vatican Bank et al
as 5:2015cv03143
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rucker
Defendant:
Vatican Bank, World Bank, International Monetary Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Todd v. USA et al
as 1:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Byron Tyrome Todd
Defendant:
USA, U.S. Person(s) and World Bank, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine v. Springs et al
as 5:2014cv03166
Plaintiff:
Dean J. Devine, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark W. Springs, The World Famous Country Pawn and Supply and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foster v. Gadberry et al
as 1:2011cv01956
Plaintiff:
Claude Derek Foster
Defendant:
Bonnie Gadberry, Gary Watkins, Tony Carochi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. World
as 1:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tarnell L. Jones, Tupac A. Shakur, Justion L. Young and others
Defendant:
World
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
