Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Justice Walter Williamson
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility, Amanda Lilly and Enid County Police Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Walter D Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Walter D. Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Winston Ray Walters
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Mark Walters
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ford v. Board of County Commissioners for Stephens County Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Josette Ford
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for Stephens County Oklahoma, Wayne McKinney, Walter Kassanavoid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walters v. Zeavin et al
as 5:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Mark Walters
Defendant:
Dr. Spencer Zeavin and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguilar-Chaidez v. The Geo Group Inc
as 5:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Walter Manuel Aguilar-Chaidez
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamarr v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Walter E Lamarr
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
