Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv03170
Defendant:
Washington, DC, City of, John G. Roberts, Mike Pence and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos v. United States Secretary of State et al
as 5:2013cv03013
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
United States Secretary of State, United States Secretary of Defense, President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Doe et al
as 5:2012cv03225
Petitioner:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Respondent:
John Doe and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Humphreys et al
as 5:2012cv03223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Karen M. Humphreys and Mary Correia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Doe
as 5:2012cv03226
Petitioner:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Humphreys
as 5:2012cv03224
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Karen M. Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Washington v. Walmsley et al
as 5:2012cv03014
Plaintiff:
Marcus B. Washington
Defendant:
Brandon Walmsley, Gary Wilson, Raymond Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. USA
as 2:2011cv02237
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tony Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lynn v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03073
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Larry Hoshaw, Susan Gibreal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03045
Petitioner:
Marcus B. Washington
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
