Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Alford (ID 57845) v. Harrod et al
as 5:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Brent L. Alford
Defendant:
Gordon Harrod, Robert Wray and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Biden, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO P. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, et al., MAYORKAS, et al., DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS, GOVERNOR J. POLIS, et al. and others
Quintana v. Clark, et al
as 23-4084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
LOGAN CLARK, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, TODD GAY, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison and others
Quintana v. Clark, et al
as 23-4063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
LOGAN CLARK, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, TODD GAY, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
