Cases 91 - 100 of 121
Smith v. McKune et al
as 5:2008cv03030
Plaintiff:
Benny R Smith
Defendant:
David R. McKune, (fnu) Myers, (fnu) Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. McKune et al
as 5:2008cv03029
Petitioner:
Bruce Stephen Sloan
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Paul Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corbett v. State of Kansas, et al
as 08-3016
Petitioner - Appellant:
TREVER J. CORBETT
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Kansas Department of Corrections, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Johnson v. McKune et al
as 5:2007cv03299
Plaintiff:
Robert Dean Johnson
Defendant:
David R. McKune and Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rassel v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03290
Plaintiff:
Todd A Rassel
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune, Impact Design LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burden v. McKune
as 5:2007cv03287
Petitioner:
Gerry A Burden
Respondent:
David R. McKune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03244
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Charles E. Simmons, Bill Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Six, et al
as 07-3268
Petitioner - Appellant:
KERRY MALONE
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, PHILL KLINE, Attorney General of Kansas and STEPHEN N. SIX
Valdez v. McKune, et al
as 07-3251
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADAM VALDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Rhodes v. Raymond et al
as 5:2007cv03228
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Rhodes
Defendant:
Don Raymond, Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
