Cases 101 - 110 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cheshire v. Villalpando et al
as 1:2009cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cheshire
Defendant:
Jose Villalpando, Fedex Ground Package Systems, Fedex Ground Package Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cucich v. Gardner et al
as 1:2009cv01511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cucich
Defendant:
Dana D. Gardner, Karen Moody, FedEx Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Henriques v. FedEx Corporation
as 1:2009cv00526
Plaintiff:
Joao Henriques
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YRC Logistics, Inc. v. Fedex National LTL, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02487
Plaintiff:
YRC Logistics, Inc., YRC Logistics, Inc. and YRC Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Fedex National LTL, Inc. and Fedex National LTL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rascon v. FedEx et al
as 1:2008cv02101
Plaintiff:
Kenneth (I) Rascon and Kenneth Rascon
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and FedEx Home Delivery
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flowers v. Federal Express Corporation, et al
as 08-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA A. FLOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FEDEX EXPRESS and FRED W. SCHNEIDER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rogers v. Federal Express Corporation
as 07-5176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNIE ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Originally sued as Fedex Express
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
