Cases 101 - 110 of 119
Denney v. Werholtz, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-3132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE M.L. DENNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity and JEFF SMITH, CMI, Kansas Computation Unit, in his individual and official capacity
Gallagher v. Shelton, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-3113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL P. GALLAGHER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. SHELTON, Warden, Norton Correctional Facility, R. C. PERDUE, Deputy Warden, Norton Correctional Facility, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections and others
Lucero v. McKune, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-3085
Petitioner - Appellant:
KERRY LUCERO
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Kansas Secretary of Corrections and STEPHEN SIX, Attorney General for the State of Kansas
Menefee, et al v. Werholtz, et al
as 09-3068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH V. MENEFEE and DUSTIN S. BLEVINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections, ELIZABETH RICE, Interstate Compact Coordinator, Kansas Department of Corrections, JOHNNIE GODDARD, Warden, Ellsworth Correctional Facility and others
Rudd v. Werholtz, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-3268
Respondent - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, State of Kansas and STEPHEN N. SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROLAND RUDD, AKA Isreal Aziz Farrahkan
Robertson v. State of Kansas, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-3235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA J. ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of the Kansas Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity and others
Strope, et al v. Collins, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-3188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE STROPE, AKA Gordon Strope
Plaintiff:
ALAN KINGSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM COLLINS, Mail Review Officer, Lansing Correctional Facility, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and WILLIAM CUMMINGS, Secretary of Corrections Designee
Bafford v. Pokorski, et al
as 08-3171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN WILLIAM BAFFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
(FNU) POKORSKI, Correctional Officer I, in his individual and official capacity, KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, in her individual and official capacity and ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity
Davis v. Rice, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-3164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH L. RICE, Secretary of Corrections Designee, individually and as an employee for the Kansas Department of Corrections, SAM CLINE, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, individually and as an employee for the Kansas Department of Corrections, JOHN/JANE DOES, Employees, in their individual and official capacity and others
Worrell v. Bruce, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-3049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WORRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
L. E. BRUCE, Warden, DAVID R MC KUNE, Warden and KANSAS SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.