Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amazon.com Inc. et al v. Garciaflores et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Petitioner:
Amazon Logistics Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.
Respondent:
John Garciaflores and David Kavasadze
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
S. et al v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc., Premera Blue Cross and Premera Blue Cross Heritage Shared Deductible Plan
Plaintiff:
Amanda S. and S. A. R.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Vinyard v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Jason W Vinyard
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Craig v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Roice Craig
Defendant:
Midea America Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff:
ADAM STREGE
Defendant:
GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Beaver v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2023cv02675
Plaintiff:
Bettina B Beaver
Defendant:
Denver Amazon and Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
