Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Garner v. Samuels et al
as 5:2014cv00089
Petitioner:
Markie Kenneth Garner
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, Stacia A Hylton and Eric H Holder, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Fox
as 5:2013cv01280
Petitioner:
James Lee Williams, II
Respondent:
John B Fox, Charles E Samuels, Jr, J A Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv03138
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spigelman v. Samuels et al
as 5:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Joel S Spigelman
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, Paul A Kastner and Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Laird, et al
as 13-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
In re: Stine, et al
as 13-3257
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
Jameson v. Samuel
as 13-6237
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON JAMESON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director
Nunn v. Samuels
as 5:2013cv00660
Petitioner:
Tyron Nunn
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stine v. Laird et al
as 5:2013cv03101
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Paul Laird, Amber Nelson, Gordon Harpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gaines v. Samuels
as 5:2013cv03019
Petitioner:
Calvin Bernis Gaines
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
