Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Twitty v. Daniels
as 1:2010cv00634
Petitioner:
Andre J. Twitty
Respondent:
C. D. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hornsby v. Jones, et al
as 10-6064
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD D. HORNSBY
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, BOBBY BOONE, Assistant Director DOC and J D DANIELS, Assistant Director Parold Board
Fennell v. Jones et al
as 6:2009cv00275
Petitioner:
Louis W Fennell
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone and J. D. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board et al
as 5:2009cv00618
Petitioner:
Carneil Davis
Respondent:
Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, J D Daniels, Susan B Loving and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fennell v. Jones et al
as 5:2009cv00449
Petitioner:
Louis W Fennell
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone and J D Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hornsby v. Jones et al
as 5:2009cv00418
Petitioner:
Harold D Hornsby
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone and J D Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Xanders et al v. City of Wichita, Kansas
as 6:2008cv01238
Plaintiff:
Roger Xanders, Jr., Roger Xanders, Jr., Darin D. Bastin and others
Defendant:
City of Wichita, Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Koch v. Daniels
as 07-6210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER KOCH
Defendant - Appellee:
J D DANIELS, Deputy Director, Pardon and Parole Board
Hornsby v. Henry et al
as 5:2007cv00368
Plaintiff:
Harold D Hornsby
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Justin Jones, J D Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
