Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01766
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Stine v. George et al
as 5:2010cv03151
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
(fnu) George, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Michael K. Nalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Provencio v. Lappin et al
as 1:2010cv01638
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Provencio
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Michael K. Nalley and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bustos v. A&E Television Networks, et al
as 10-1253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEE BUSTOS
Defendant - Appellee:
A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARRELL WATTS, individually and as Administrator, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Deberry v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00725
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Deberry
Defendant:
Blake R. Davis, J. Fox, D. Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hatten v. Andert et al
as 1:2010cv00601
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
R. Andert, A. Barker, J. C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hatten v. Holland, et al
as 10-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND, R. ANDERT, SARA REVELL and others
Adams v. Wiley, et al
as 10-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WILEY, D. ROY, T. HERMAN and others
Hatten v. Holland et al
as 1:2009cv02853
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
J. C. Holland, R. Andert, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barringer v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv02269
Plaintiff:
Derek W. Barringer
Defendant:
Marty C. Anderson, Michael K. Nalley, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
