Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Aurelio, et al v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 19-1362
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA ORTIZ, Investigator, MICHAEL MILLER, DAVID ZUPAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. AURELIO
Plaintiff:
ALAN DEATLEY
In re: Syngenta AG MIR 162
as 19-3066
Defendant / Appellee:
HOVLAND AND RASMUS, PLLC, JOHN DOES, 1-250, PATTON HOVERSTEN & BERG, PA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROMLEY RANCH, LLC, CHARLES BLAKE STRINGER, GARTH KRUGER and others
Copher v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Malinda McMillian, Michael Miller, Anthony (I) A. DeCesaro and others
Plaintiff:
Scot Copher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellogg et al v. Watts Guerra, LLP et al
as 2:2018cv02408
Defendant:
Cross Law Firm, LLC, Daniel M. Homolka, Wojtalewicz Law Firm, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Kellogg Farms, Inc., Kenneth P. Kellogg, Roland B. Bromley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Aurelio v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv01974
Defendant:
Myra Walter, Michael Miller, Rick Raemisch and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Aurelio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
United States, United States Army, Judicial Branch of US Gov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty et al v. Compass Group, TLC. et al
as 1:2018cv01295
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Compass Group, TLC., Nelson Silva, Trinity Services Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01298
Plaintiff:
Terry Schramek, Shaun Lackovic, J. B. and others
Defendant:
National Foam Inc., Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc, The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields v. Miller
as 1:2018cv01081
Petitioner:
Clarence Fields
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodface v. Miller
as 1:2018cv01020
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Goodface
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
