Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Gist v. Jones, et al
as 13-6275
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEWEL WESLEY GIST
Defendant - Appellee: JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, REBECCA ADAMS, Grievance Coordinator, TIM WILKINSON, Warden and others
Knox v. Orman, et al
as 12-6066
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID ORMAN, Mailroom Supervisor, MIKE OAKLEY, General Counsel, CRAIG MARSHAL, Assistant AG and others
Huffman v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-1512
Plaintiff - Appellant: LORAL HUFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee: BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARVEY LAPPIN, DR. ALLRED and others
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 11-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee: JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JOHNNY BLEVINS, IA Administrator, RANDY KNIGHT, IA Officer and others
Strope v. Cummings, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3254
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL LEE STROPE, AKA Gordon E. Strope
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM CUMMINGS, Designee, Kansas Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, K. BECK, Corrections Officer, Lansing Correctional Facility, in her individual capacity and others
Berryhill v. Payne, et al
as 10-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES H PAYNE, U.S. District Judge, FRANK H. SEAY, U.S. District Judge, RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden, OSP and others
Burghart v. Corrections Corporation of Ame, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6083
Plaintiff - Appellant: BOBBY BURGHART
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, AKA CCA, CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHARLES RAY, Warden and others
Cole v. Pugh, et al
as 08-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY ANTHONY COLE
Defendant - Appellee: M. PUGH, Warden, C.E.O., R. HOOD, Warden, C.E.O., R. WILEY, Warden, C.E.O. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?