Cases 11 - 20 of 31
James v. Boyd Gaming Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02260
Defendant:
Boyd Gaming Corporation and Kansas Star Casino, LLC
Plaintiff:
Roger James, Scott Dwyer, Shannon Marie Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Butler County et al
as 5:2018cv03289
Defendant:
Natasha Ward, Butler County, Dennis Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Soldan et al
as 5:2018cv03029
Plaintiff:
Michael William Norris
Defendant:
Roger Soldan, Jamie Nutz and Lou Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Excel Industries, Inc. v. Berry
as 6:2015mc00109
Petitioner:
Excel Industries, Inc.
Respondent:
Thomas A. Berry
Intervenor:
Phyllis E. Norris
Fullmer v. Simpson Logback Lynch & Norris, PA
as 2:2014cv02566
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Fullmer
Defendant:
Simpson Logback Lynch & Norris, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beauclair (ID 74638) v. Norris et al
as 5:2012cv03189
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Beauclair
Defendant:
Mark Norris, David McKune and Ray Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Norris et al
as 6:2011cv01216
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thona J. Norris, Arnold E. Norris and Kansas Department of Commerce and Housing and Kansas Housing Resources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Owens v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2011cv04007
Plaintiff:
Gary Owens
Defendant:
Kansas, State of , Linn County , Linn County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Hernandez-Marcelo
as 6:2010cv01115
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Norris
Defendant:
Eleazar Hernandez-Marcelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norris v. Community America Credit Union et al
as 2:2009cv02597
Plaintiff:
John L. Norris
Defendant:
Community America Credit Union, Debbie McCarthy, Carol Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
