Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Durham v. Lappin, et al
as 09-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY SCOTT DURHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HARRELL WATTS, MICHAEL K. NALLEY and others
Nichols, et al v. United States, et al
as 09-1010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. ALLEN
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. NICHOLS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEYBA, Dr., M.D., HARVEY LAPPIN, John/Jane Doe, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Gometz v. United States, et al
as 08-1470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KARL GOMETZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARRELL WATTS and others
Verrell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv02561
Plaintiff:
Carroll Verrell
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Sara M. Revell, S. Nafziger and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bradshaw v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv02542
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bradshaw
Defendant:
Lappin, Wiley, Leyba and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Durham v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv02165
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Durham
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Harrell Watts, Michael K. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nichols et al v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv02064
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Nichols and Mark J. Allen
Defendant:
USA, Harvey Lappin, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gometz v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv01258
Plaintiff:
Randy K. Gometz
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bradshaw, et al v. Lappin, et al
as 08-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BRADSHAW, TIMOTHY TUTTAMORE and JAMIE MCMAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LAPPIN, BOP Director, WILEY, ADX Warden, COLLINS, Unit Team Member and others
Mikeal Stine v. United States, et al
as 08-1108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVEN NAFZIGER, md/ADX and RON WILEY, warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
