Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. Noel
as 2:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Wilson
Defendant:
Cameron Noel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comish v. Davis Behavioral Health et al
as 1:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Holly Lynn Comish
Defendant:
Davis Behavioral Health, Julana Noel Schenk and Jeffery M. Dalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Noel v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2011cv00748
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Noel
Defendant:
Zimmer and Zimmer Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Big Sky et al v. Teegarden et al
as 2:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Big Sky , Kerry David Sawyer and Elaine Hatch Sawyer
Defendant:
Noel Eugene Teegarden and Evelyn Hatch Teegarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Gibbons
as 2:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant:
Amy Noel Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Flynn v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00973
Petitioner:
Noel George Flynn
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Zeilhofer et al v. Business Development Solutions et al
as 2:2010mc00116
Plaintiff:
Gerald P. Zeilhofer and Christopher J. Noel
Defendant:
Business Development Solutions, HID Properties, Lyle E. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Crain Communications et al v. Magazine Billing Services et al
as 2:2008mc00181
Plaintiff:
Crain Communications, Crain Communications, Crain Management Services and others
Defendant:
Magazine Payment Services, Publishers Clearing Emporium, Publishers Processing Service and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Larsen v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2007cv00218
Plaintiff:
James Harvey Larsen
Defendant:
State of Utah, Salt Lake County Jail, Luke LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
