Cases 11 - 20 of 8,384
Miller (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Earl D. Miller
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palma-Pineda (PS) v. Cejia
as 1:2024cv01642
Petitioner:
Wilyer Emilio Palma-Pineda
Respondent:
D. Cejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melendez (PS) v. Ceja
as 1:2024cv01641
Petitioner:
Leniel Melendez
Respondent:
D. Ceja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clay (PS) v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
Carleous D. Clay
Respondent:
Michael Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whithehorn (PS) v. McCann et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Byron L. Whithehorn
Defendant:
Beth (I) McCann, Beth McCann, Lara (I) Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Maxly D. Parker, Lawrence Sanchez, Samson Solomon and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
