Cases 261 - 270 of 500
Brooks v. Medina et al
as 1:2013cv02213
Plaintiff:
Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Angel (I) Medina, David Gabriel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Medina-Gonzalez
as 13-8070
Petitioner:
ABEL MEDINA-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McClesky et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 5:2013cv00849
Plaintiff:
Hayley McClesky , Nereida Cintron , Pamela Adams and others
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Johnson v. Medina, et al
as 13-1324
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Medina v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv01936
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01898
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich
Plaintiff:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ontiveros-Perez v. Medina, et al
as 13-1298
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIO ONTIVEROS-PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucero v. Medina, et al
as 13-1300
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY LUCERO
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
