Cases 21 - 30 of 1,829
Livingston v. Weigant et al
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston also known as Aaron J Livingston Clarke also known as GTWO doing business as God Touches World Order, Aaron J Livingston Clarke and GTWO
Defendant:
Patrick Weigant, Public Defenders Office and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benavidez (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Esteven Benavidez
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
In RE: Walker Edison Furniture Company
as 2:2024mc00276
Not Yet Classified:
Walker Edison Furniture Company
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Placeholder
Defendant:
Defendant Placeholder
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Delacerda (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Delacerda
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valenzuela (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Heather Valenzuela
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tillotson (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Chris Tillotson
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray-Ginsberg (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Jon F. Gray-Ginsberg and Jon Frederick Gray-Ginsberg
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acosta (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dean Acosta
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillotson (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Chris Tillotson
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
