Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Morgan v. Tomlinson et al
as 6:2012cv00379
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Morgan
Defendant:
Jerry L. Tomlinson, Bryan County, Brian Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez et al v. Four-K Services Inc
as 5:2012cv00548
Plaintiff:
Noe Chavez and Kimberly Chavez
Defendant:
Four-K Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abdelkhaleg v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
as 6:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Osama J. Abdelkhaleg and Limna Chavez
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Essex Insurance Company v. Willco Enterprises, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Essex Insurance Company
Defendant:
Willco Enterprises, LLC, Jay Wheeler , Jensica Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chavez v. McLeod Farms Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00740
Plaintiff:
Hugo Chavez
Defendant:
McLeod Farms Inc, Brent McLeod, P Jolene McLeod and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Beaver et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 5:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Beaver, Rosetta Della Chavez, Joseph Beaver, Sr and others
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Sergio V Saavedra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuthill v. Condren et al
as 5:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tony D Tuthill
Defendant:
Sheila A Condren, Sheila A Condren, Edith Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chavez v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv01353
Plaintiff:
Pete R Chavez
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Canterberry v. Chavez
as 5:2007cv01235
Plaintiff:
David L Canterberry
Defendant:
Macias Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
