Cases 21 - 30 of 280
Brick v. Darnell et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tisha Brick
Defendant:
Elaine Darnell, Kendra Otis, Lee Widner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rozzoni v. Schempp-Hirth Flugzeugbau GmbH et al
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Joan Rozzoni
Defendant:
Schempp-Hirth Flugzeugbau GmbH a Foreign Corporation doing business as Schepp-Hirth Flugzeug-Vertriebs GmbH, M&H Soaring, LZ Design and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Salas v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Lorenzo A. Salas
Respondent:
Leon Martinez, Anthony Romero and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Encinias v. Central New Mexico Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv01145
Plaintiff:
Trini Encinias
Defendant:
Central New Mexico Correctional Facility, State of New Mexico, New Mexico Corrections Department (NMCD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Alum Financial, LLC
as 1:2021cv00798
Plaintiff:
Katharine H Hendricks
Defendant:
Alum Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00691
Plaintiff:
Travis H Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wiggins v. Hatch et al
as 1:2021cv00670
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wiggins
Defendant:
T. Hatch, FNU Benninger, FNU Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaya v. Central N.M.C.F et al
as 1:2021cv00650
Petitioner:
Arsenio R. Anaya
Respondent:
Central N.M.C.F and Hector H Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C.H. v. Howard et al
as 2:2021cv00574
Defendant:
Las Cruces Public Schools and Patrick Howard
Plaintiff:
C. H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
