Cases 21 - 30 of 40
D.R. Horton, Inc. et al v. Angel, et al
as 1:2012cv01286
Defendant:
Ivelisse Cruz, Tracee Edwards, Edward Caulder and others
Plaintiff:
D.R. Horton, Inc. and DRH Southwest Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Suntrust Bank v. Harpers Auto Parts, Inc et al
as 1:2011mc00039
Plaintiff:
Suntrust Bank
Defendant:
Harpers Auto Parts, Inc, Brad E Harper, Lugina B Mendez-Harper and others
Sanchez et al v. Byerley et al
as 1:2011cv00728
Plaintiff:
Cresencia Sanchez and Leo Sanchez
Defendant:
Brad Byerley, Vance Belyeu, Doug Gouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archuleta, et al v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2011cv00510
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque , Richard J. Berry , Don Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Archuleta , Richard Dineen , Carole Eberhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eden v. Lama et al
as 1:2011cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Wallace Eden
Defendant:
Albert Lama, Alex Romero, Alice Gandaradiaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Braverman v. LPL Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Kate Braverman
Defendant:
LPL Financial Corporation, Mark Casady, Brad Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Braverman v. LPL Financial Corporation et al
as 6:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Kate Braverman
Defendant:
LPL Financial Corporation, Mark Casady, Brad Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Nance v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2009cv00361
Plaintiff:
Brad L Nance
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
