Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8031
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, UPPER GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION, SOMMERS RANCH, LLC and others
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 22-8022
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and UPPER GREEN RIVER ALLIANCE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, JONAH ENERGY, LLC and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Environmental Health
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Administrator Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 - Clean Air Act -- Citizen Suit to Enforce Clean Air Act
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-1426
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-1425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-1412
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, UTAH PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION and others
Center for Biological, et al v. US Department of the Interior, et al
as 21-4098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS, COLORADO RIVERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH and UTAH BOARD OF WATER RESOURCES
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2021cv00733
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Respondent:
Randy Moore, Deb Haaland and Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Center for Biological, et al v. Walsh, et al
as 21-1200
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization and HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, a non-profit organization
Respondent:
AURELIA SKIPWIRTH, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
