Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Whitaker v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03232
Petitioner:
Sterling Whitaker
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ahmed v. Donley et al
as 5:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Arjune Ahmed
Defendant:
D. Donley, (fnu) Deloiah, (fnu) Gabriel and others
Interested Party:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zea v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03110
Petitioner:
Marcos Alonzo Zea
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turnbo v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03075
Petitioner:
Richard Glenn Turnbo
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flemming et al v. Dayoub, et al
as 5:2022cv03066
Plaintiff:
Antonio B. Flemming, James Michael Poterbin, Kurt Kingsley and others
Defendant:
Charles A. Dayoub, United States Marshal Service, (fnu) Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03063
Petitioner:
Darren W. Brown
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Westberg v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03060
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dean Westberg
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vonderahe v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03043
Petitioner:
Bryan George Vonderahe
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lockwood v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv03027
Plaintiff:
Jared Lockwood
Defendant:
Michael Smith, D. Hudson and Kristine Aulepp
Interested Party:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pettaway v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03022
Plaintiff:
Rayquan Pettaway
Defendant:
D. Hudson and (fnu) Early
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.