Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Salazar v. Rios et al
as 1:2010cv02390
Petitioner:
Ernest Salazar
Respondent:
H. A. Rios, Jr. and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hugley v. Rios et al
as 5:2010cv00336
Petitioner:
Eddie Louis Hugley, Jr
Respondent:
H A Rios, Jr and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Holz v. United States, et al
as 08-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, REBECCA TAMEZ and others
Holz v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv01753
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
USA, Harley (I) G. Lappin, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Butler. v. Rios, et al
as 07-1528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND A BUTLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
H A RIOS, JR., Warden and PRICE, Correctional Officer
Villabona-Alvarado v. USA et al
as 1:2007cv01937
Plaintiff:
Mario E. Villabona-Alvarado
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, H. A. Rios, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Rios et al
as 1:2007cv01673
Plaintiff:
Leroy Porter
Defendant:
H. A. Rios, Jr., M. Medine, A. Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Rios et al
as 1:2007cv01249
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Butler, Jr
Defendant:
H. A. Rios, Jr. and Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Rios, et al
as 07-1194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD E. NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
H. A. RIOS, JR., Warden, DEBORAH BRADFIELD, B.S.W., DAVID CRAGO, Ph.D. and others
Watson v. Pollard et al
as 1:2007cv00868
Plaintiff:
Shane Randy Watson
Defendant:
H. A. Rios, Jr., Federal Bureau of Prisons and Calvin Polland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
