Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Castillo v. Donahoe
as 14-2117
Plaintiff:
GLORIA A. PACHECO
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
:
Fay v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv01093
Plaintiff:
JM (Maria J) Fay
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Sullivan, Melody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonidy, et al v. USPS, et al
as 13-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAB BONIDY and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, PATRICK DONAHOE, Postmaster General and MICHAEL KERVIN, Postmaster, Avon, Colorado
Bonidy, et al v. USPS, et al
as 13-1374
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAB BONIDY and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, PATRICK DONAHOE, Postmaster General and MICHAEL KERVIN, Acting Postmaster, Avon, Colorado
Bonidy, et al v. USPS, et al
as 13-1374
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK DONAHOE, Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MICHAEL KERVIN, Acting Postmaster, Avon, Colorado
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAB BONIDY and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
