Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Bennett v. Johnson et al
as 4:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Edward Bennett
Defendant:
Lashedda Johnson, Mark Wollmershauser, Tulsa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. Espy et al
as 4:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Joe Lamont Ballard
Defendant:
Thaddeus Espy and Tulsa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens et al v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
Martinez Owens, Martinez Owens, Diana Doxey and others
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Tulsa, City of and D. J. Radnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Latimer, et al v. Tulsa, City of, et al
as 4:2009cv00450
Plaintiff:
Daniel Latimer, et al
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gholson v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Charles Gholson and Charles Gholson
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Jack Pennington and Charlie Shatto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simms v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
Lester Simms
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Tulsa, City of and Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rasheed v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Shadeed Albas Rasheed
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Jason Muse, J M Tate and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alexander et al v. Housing and Urban Development, US Department of, et al
as 4:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
James Alexander, Jr. and Bernice Alexander
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development, US Department of, Oklahoma Housing Financing Authority, Tulsa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andrews v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2008cv00759
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M Andrews
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of and Mark Boese
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
