Cases 21 - 30 of 1,094
Kush v. Department of the Air Force et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Max Kush
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force, United States Attorney for the District of Utah and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sandy v. The State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1019
Plaintiff:
BAYARDO RENO SANDY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF COLORADO, PHIL WEISER, Colorado Attorney General, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Jefferson v. United States Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 5:2024cv04003
Plaintiff:
Jefferey J. Jefferson, Sr. and Jeffery Jerome Jefferson, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Veteran Affairs, Kris Kobach, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Izaguirre Corea, et al v. Garland
as 24-9500
Petitioner:
DARWIN LEONE IZAGUIRRE COREA, IDANIA CAROLINA ORELLANA MUNOZ, N..A.I.O. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Chavez-Viscaino, et al v. Garland
as 23-9609
Petitioner:
OSCAR CHAVEZ-VISCAINO, MARIA CHRISTINA RASCON-MIRELES, OSCAR TRINIDAD CHAVEZ-RODRIGUEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gomez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 23-9607
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR GOMEZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ruiz-Nava v. Garland
as 23-9606
Petitioner:
JOSE DAVID RUIZ-NAVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Maldonado-Magno, et al v. Garland
as 23-9604
Petitioner:
WALTER MALDONADO-MAGNO, ANDREA UCHUYPOMA-PALOMINO and LOAN MALDONADO-UCHUYPOMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
