Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 253
American Petroleum, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8076
Petitioner / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Petitioner: CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, WYOMING MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent / Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Arcamone-Makinano et al v. United States Department of the Interior Secretary et al
as 0:2021cv00196
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior Secretary, United States Bureau of Land Management Director, Deborah Halaand and others
Plaintiff: Amelia Arcamone-Makinano, Bonifacio Makinano and Pauline St. Denis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-2116
Plaintiff / Appellant: DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency within the Unite States Department of the Interior, TIM SPISAK, in his official capacity as Acting New Mexico State Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, DJR ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, SIMCOE, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02385
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hamann v. United States Department of the Interior, The We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02383
Plaintiff: Daniel W. Hamann
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Oklahoma State of et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00719
Plaintiff: Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Department of Mines and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, Debra A Haaland, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement and others
Intervenor: Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276
Sierra County Commission et al v. The United States Department of the Interior et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00611
Respondent: Deb Haaland, The United States Department of the Interior, Martha Williams and others
Petitioner: William R. Lindsey, County Commissioners of the County of Sierra, Salopek Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Kansas ex rel Kobach, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-3097
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAC AND FOX NATION OF MISSOURI IN KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, CITY OF MULVANE, KANSAS and others
Southern Utah Wilderness, et al v. DOI, et al
as 21-4073
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, SIERRA CLUB, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and AHMED MOHSEN, in his official capacity as Color Country District Manager
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF UTAH and GARFIELD COUNTY
BP America Production Company v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 0:2021cv00105
Respondent: United States Department of Interior Secretary, Office of Natural Resources Revenue Director, Kimbra Davis and others
Petitioner: BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?